Pod go dsp limitations I was thinking it could be like the Pod Go with the full Helix engine (sort of like a Stomp or Stomp XL in the Supporting Membership more DSP, dual paths, better I/O. Dynamic management leaves you in control and provides much more flexibility while also permitting you to use virtually ALL available DSP when you want to. Just to clarify, I have tried out the POD Go, but I haven't been able to try the G6 because it isn't available in the U. Well I wanted a sub 500 dollar backup and I had already tried Pod Go, HD500, GP-10, and Mooer GE-250. Of course the POD Go has its own limitations but not as constraining. Part 1 Background Regular attendees here may be aware that I've been looking for a modern MFX unit (and I'd virtually decided on the new Line 6 Pod Go) to take-over from my big and PRIVACY POLICY. 7 4. It might be a bit more accessible in term of how to use it. FRFR isnt for me. . Here’s another Helix preset viewer that includes It's been a year since my initial POD GO review, and it's STILL something I get questions about quite a bit. So, if you've reached a DSP limit, try using less DSP hungry options to free up DSP. And that's what the POD GO contains so don't get thrown off if advice is labeled Helix or HX Stomp because the techniques typically used can then be ported to POD GO with certain limitations. I use it for things where a Drop wouldn't be enough. Pod Go does not support 3rd party amp sims. We won’t go into too much detail on the tech specs here. However, Pod Go has been a victim of its own success and has spawned a whole host of new competitor units including the Zoom G6, Valeton GP200, Headrush MX5, Boss GX100 and even reduced pricing of the Mooer GE300. I couldn't be happier with it being replaced by the stomp. Both Helix & Pod Go use dynamic DSP so even though the amp and cab is a fixed block, these still share the remaining DSP with the (up to) four flexible blocks. Media. Even with these limitations, I think its a great multifx / modeler. But I'm the type that uses two or three amps per preset in my LT and have had to get pretty creative to get by with the Pod Go. Reactions: Thorti and adam0211. HD would get DSP limited on those hard core patches but I can work around these limitations as they were not core to what I use 99. The POD Go allocates a certain amount of DSP to the fixed blocks and uses dynamic DSP for the remainder. Whereas the Stomp has 8 blocks that you can do whatever you want with (including parallel paths), it's basically just half of the full Helix. Also utilizes less DSP than other Dynamic reverbs. But yea, otherwise a pretty accurate post. 0 firmware upgrade, on past timescales I doubt Pod Go will receive this update for some 4-6 mths. The Line 6 Pod Go uses a 400MHz SHARC DSP processor for processing your digital tones. It wouldn't recognize the Stomp patches coming in, though, and you couldn't edit them. So I wanted to make sure before I tried this. 100% agree and that's what I've been contemplating too. But still a bit more compact. That is to say, they are expressed as a percentage of the user-controllable portion of the DSP power. The form factor of the POD Go is perfect for the stages I play and something its size with more horsepower would have me handing over my credit card in a heartbeat. I am always ready to help folk, and support sensible rationalized views that are balanced. Visit the Line 6 Store. My main device is an HX Stomp, but if I didn't have that, my POD Go would be my main device. e. You'd get the same DSP, a smaller footprint than 2 separate devices, and you wouldn't have the limitations of the POD anymore. I always felt wanting, or left out, when I had the POD Go; not so much now with the Stomp. (POD Go has 4 fixed blocks that are always EQ, Wah, Volume, Amp+Cab, as well as 4 variable blocks that you can make almost anything. On top of being a lot more flexible when you also want to add extra effects, note that DSP limits will make it not possible to run this many blocks at once, especially if you’re using more heavy effects. Of course due to DSP limitations I'll have to make compromises. Line 6's original Pod Go philosophy was to provide a user friendly, simpler approach that would give users One benefit to spillover is that you can assign TEN "spillover patches" using Command Center whereas with snapshots you only have eight. POD Go 2. means they can't free up extra dsp to use Pod Go as a more flexible pure fx unit if they go through a real amp and cab. But the promise of the Pod Go was Helix-quality sounds at a Pod price, and it delivers on that promise. POD Go has a 4-in/4-out audio/MIDI interface with re-amping built in. Reactions: ucnick, benihanna I do run into DSP limitations, but Howdy, Stranger! It looks like you're new here. POD Go is available in my When considering high-quality, versatile floorboard amp modelers, Neural DSP offers two exceptional choices: Quad Cortex and Nano Cortex. Given the same block flow, POD Go should sound identical to Helix/HX, with the following caveats: The three effects with the biggest DSP hit were omitted (Tone Sovereign, The biggest drawback of the Pod Go is that you can't do dual amp/cab patches and you are much more limited with how many effects you can have. I had a Pod Go as my first all in one solution and was frustrated at the DSP limitations. There is loads of info available on this, but the amount of DSP used in total by the fixed blocks (wah, volume, eq, noisegate, fx loop etc) is very small and not enough to power other fx. For example, based on an online estimator , the Del Sol 300 amp block will take up about 10% of your DSP, but the Brit Plexi Jump takes 41%. Son. But yeah, the LT makes a lot of sense as an upgrade from a Pod Go. And Ben’s tables are really useful in that respect. The sounds of the Pod Go are exactly the same as the Helix ones minus some heavy effects and also having a fixed chain. G11 & Pod GO: an affordable multi-effect unit perfect for diverse tones, modern distortions, and all-in-one home practice. g. If users select effects that use higher DSP, we accept that there will only be sufficient processing The section in the release notes with the header "New Cabs and IRs now use 66-80% Less DSP" makes me hopeful. Or be cheap like me and use free ir software. Pod Go updates broadly follow Helix updates, and the v3. Obviously this won't be until after helix 3. it's difficult to do basically anything aside EDIT: I tried the POD Go and it couldn't even handle two delays and two reverbs at the same time. '63 verb is That means you would have no DSP limitations while playing through the Stomp as long as you set up your path in Native. or if you are concerned about DSP limitations because you plan to use a lot of effects in a single preset (or a lot of poly shifting), the larger units are the only choice. the suggestions from that same community will quite often make you wish you bought into the Helix platform because the limitations of the POD Go routing will (at some time) come back to The fixed blocks in Pod Go cannot be changed. Also, when we had Bass auditions for my band, we used the Pod Go as a Bass pre-amp into a poweramp and 4x10 cab. New posts New media New media comments Latest activity. Manufacturers are under no requirement to provide firmware updates and a lot of time and effort goes into these. The POD Go, like every multi-FX device, has a limit to its DSP processing capacity. In terms of what will come to Pod Go from the 3. Merch Shop. in reality the Blending option is truly needed in the Pod Go for having easy access to creating truly unique tones especially when 80% of your tone is in Howdy, Stranger! It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons! POD Go doesn't have the pitch stuff right now, so I'd take that off the board. 25K TV - it Unlike on the Pod Go, the HX Stomp XL gives you 8 fully customizable blocks of which you aren’t stuck with just fixed ones. The stomp might be a better and more flexible solution, especially with firmware 3. The Pod Go is / was amazing but it only made me want the power of a full Helix. I started with the POD Go and fairly quickly hit the DSP limitations. I think the pod go form factor is tough to beat if you don’t need the extra dsp or blocks. I don't like how you can't remove the wha, eq, volume, etc from the chain and change it for something else, I mean, I NEVER use a wha pedal for example, so I feel that is an fx block that will be just wasted, also, I would probably never use an eq pedal or I'm interested in recreating HX Edit presets to Pod Go Edit presets. Hotone Ampero II. Even then, not all the goodies in v3. The MX5 amp models sound good but I much prefer using the PG editor on my PC to building patches on the MX5. pattern ideal for home practice, a USB audio interface feature, and a variety of connection terminals. Most manufacturers design the device with constraints like the above so that this limitation is never observed by the ZOOM G6 vs. Home. I also have a Helix LT (replacement for the Stomp) and must admit, the main reason is the DSP. I use a POD GO. 70 and as Pod Go has only just had its big v2. Helix amps and effects simply use more sophisticated DSP tools than other boxes at POD Go's price point. The limitations on the POD Go drove me mad, even with the fx loop in place. not As a pod go user myself I just wanted to point out that the pod go does the effects DSP usage calculation as you're adding the effects to the patch, so what you may find is that (hypothetically) if you're using a crazy reverb model + crazy delay model, you're not able to add a tremolo to the patch, even if you don't intend to use them all at [POD GO] I just ordered a pod go, what are some of its shortcomings in terms of effects? I've run into some dsp limitations while playing around with it, but when actually making patches that I use when paying it hasn't been an issue. The legacy ping pond delay in mono is less than 2% of your DSP, whereas the So, I really like the new POD GO, I really want to buy but there's one thing that is making me doubt about it. I guess Im a good fit for the Pod go because I would free up a lot of DSP just by using my own reverb externally. Elija, edite y controle sonidos usando la gran pantalla LCD a color, cinco codificadores push, ocho interruptores de pie resistentes y un pedal de expresión multifunción de aluminio fundido, y agregue dos pedales externos o un segundo pedal de expresión para un control Howdy, Stranger! It looks like you're new here. If users select effects that use higher DSP, we The POD Go has a less powerful processor and it's limited in not only the amount of blocks you can fit but also the order as well. The AMP OUT is really something I use a lot and am so glad it has true dual mode outputs. Forums. 12. 게다가 용량이 좀 큰 이펙터를 쓴다하면 DSP의 한계 때문에 몇몇 이펙터는 구동이 안됩니다. See the chart The Pod Go looper has certain limitations not just re its short recording time but also functionality ie ability to use different patches - you can't switch tones from one patch to The G6 seems to be a competitor to the POD Go but I can't find an actual comparison of the two. New posts Trending Search forums. But for me, I Yeah, I use my Pod Go over my MX5 as an interface/studio tool. And then you're given 4 open blocks to use. It will do what you want easily, you could even add more to a preset than that. 70 will come into Pod Go because of its DSP limitations. He heard a couple of my Helix patches the other day and was wondering if Supporting Membership. Amazon's Choice highlights highly rated, well-priced products available to ship immediately. mykajabi. Having had a Zoom G5 Anybody go HX Stomp to Pod Go? Thinking of taking my Stomp off the main board to be replaced individual pedals. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons! I would generally highly recommend a Pod Go for any lower level gigging musician, but it still comes with real caveats, and somebody with an existing gig rig might be better off staying with what they have potentially. llhj pzzjf zdt fxdwp jqcdw hbwz ositg uonuyaq wisvs hicjq clxfxs qrv xohu qhom ygzqx